1. Wright, B. et al, “Nonlinguistic perceptual deficits associated with reading and language disorders,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 10, pp. 482-486 (2000). See Abstract.
  2. Witton, C. et al, “Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers,” Current Biology, vol. 8, pp. 791-797 (1998). See Abstract
  3. Wilmer, J. et al, “Two Visual Motion Processing Deficits in Developmental Dyslexia Associated with Different Reading Skills Deficits,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 528-540 (2004). See Abstract
  4. Talcott, J. et al, “Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: evidence for temporal and energy integration deficits,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 38, pp. 935-943 (2000).
  5. Steinman, B. et al, “Reading with an M Neuron: How a defective magnocellular pathway interferes with normal reading,” chapter 11, pp. 209.
  6. Stein, J. “The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia,” Dyslexia, vol. 7, pp. 12-36 (2001). See Abstract
  7. Stein, J. et al, “To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia,” Trends Neurosci., vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 147-152 (1997).
  8. Skottun, B. “The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: the evidence from contrast sensitivity,” Vision Research, vol. 40, pp. 111-127 (2000). See Abstract
  9. Ray, N. et al, “Yellow filters can improve magnocellular function: motion sensitivity, convergence, accommodation, and reading,”  Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 1039, pp. 283-293 (2005). See Abstract
  10. O’Brien, B. et al, “The effect of contrast on reading speed in dyslexia,”  Vision Research, vol. 40, pp. 1921-1935 (2000). See Paper
  11. Newsome, W. et al, “A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT),”  The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 2201-2211 (1988). See Abstract
  12. Lovegrove, W. et al, “Visual Temporal Processing Deficits in Specific Reading Disability,” p. 311. See Abstract
  13. Lovegrove, W. et al, “A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, Volume 3, Issue 2, 1986. See Abstract.